When it comes to short-term rentals (STRs) like those found on Airbnb or Vrbo, a big question keeps popping up across the country: Who gets to make the rules? Should the state government set one standard for everyone, or should local cities and counties decide what’s best for their own communities? This debate over state vs. local STR regulation is heating up, and recent events show just how different the approaches can be.
Austin Takes Action: Making Platforms Collect Taxes
Let’s look at Austin, Texas. While the city is still figuring out some bigger changes to its STR rules (now delayed until October 2025), they made one important move starting April 1, 2025.
Now, platforms like Airbnb and Vrbo must collect the city’s 11% Hotel Occupancy Tax (HOT) on every booking. This applies to all STRs in Austin, even if the property doesn’t have a city license.
Why did Austin do this? Officials estimate around 10,000 unlicensed rentals weren’t paying this tourism tax. This new rule aims to fix that, ensuring STRs contribute tax revenue similar to traditional hotels. It means guests will pay more, but the city expects a significant boost in funds for tourism and cultural projects. This is a clear example of a local government using its power to solve a specific local problem.
States Step In: Different Directions on Local Power
While Austin focused locally, state legislatures are taking broader actions, often pulling in opposite directions.
- More Power to Locals (Louisiana): In Louisiana, lawmakers are moving forward with bills that clearly support local control. House Bill 469 confirms that cities and parishes can set their own STR rules, like requiring permits or safety checks. Another bill, Senate Bill 225, goes further. It would ban unlicensed STRs statewide and cleverly allows neighbors or community groups to sue illegal operators. This gives local areas another tool for enforcement, especially helpful where city resources are limited.
- Less Power to Locals (Ohio & Idaho): Ohio and Idaho are heading the other way. Proposed laws there (Ohio Senate Bill 104, Idaho Senate Bill 1162) aim to limit what local governments can do. These bills try to stop cities and counties from enacting common STR restrictions, such as:
- Outright bans on STRs
- Requiring the owner to live on the property
- Using zoning to keep STRs out of neighborhoods
- Setting high license fees or strict limits on the number of rentals.
- Lobbying Matters (Washington State): Sometimes, industry players influence these state decisions. In Washington State, a proposal to let local governments add an optional tax (up to 4%) on STRs failed. Reports suggest Airbnb spent heavily lobbying against it. This shows how powerful platforms can be in shaping state vs. local STR regulation debates.
What Does This Mean for STRs?
This ongoing push-and-pull between state and local control highlights a few key things:
- Platforms Are Watching: Companies like Airbnb and Vrbo pay close attention to proposed rules. They fight hard against laws they dislike (like new taxes) but might work with cities on rules they can live with, or comply when mandated (like Austin’s tax collection). Handling these different short-term rental laws is a big part of their business strategy.
- Enforcement is Tricky: Even with new rules, making sure everyone follows them is a challenge. Houston officials worried about enforcing their new ordinance. Austin delayed rule changes partly to get better tracking software. Louisiana’s idea of letting neighbors sue suggests official enforcement isn’t always enough. This “enforcement gap” is a real issue.
- The Conflict Continues: The core argument – state authority vs. local needs – isn’t going away. Debates often pit statewide economic arguments against local worries about housing, neighborhood peace, and quality of life. Expect more battles over state vs. local STR regulation in legislatures and city halls.
The rules for short-term rentals are constantly changing, shaped by this fundamental conflict over who holds the power to regulate.
