StaySTRa.com

Short Term Rental News and Ideas

Author: Jed Collins

  • Why Every Realtor Should Own a Short-Term Rental: The Tax Advantage You Already Qualify For

    Why Every Realtor Should Own a Short-Term Rental: The Tax Advantage You Already Qualify For

    Picture this: You’re sitting across from your CPA, and they’ve just delivered the news that you owe $45,000 in taxes this year. Your commissions were strong, but Uncle Sam wants his cut. Now imagine walking out of that same meeting having legally reduced that tax bill by $30,000 or more—simply because you own a short-term rental property.

    That’s not wishful thinking. That’s the reality for real estate professionals who understand the intersection of their license status and STR ownership.

    As someone who’s spent more time reviewing tax codes than I care to admit (and I’ve got the reading glasses to prove it), I can tell you this: if you hold a real estate license and you’re not leveraging it for STR tax advantages, you’re leaving serious money on the table. Let me explain why you’re already qualified for one of the most powerful tax strategies in real estate investing.

    The Real Estate Professional Status: You’re Already There

    Here’s the thing most Realtors don’t realize—you’ve already done the hard work. While other investors struggle to meet the requirements for Real Estate Professional Status (REPS), you likely qualified the moment you started actively selling homes.

    The IRS has two primary requirements for REPS qualification:

    The 750-Hour Test: You must perform more than 750 hours of services during the tax year in real property trades or businesses in which you materially participate.

    The More-Than-50% Test: More than half of your personal services performed in all trades or businesses during the tax year must be in real property trades or businesses.

    For most full-time real estate agents, these aren’t aspirational goals—they’re inevitable outcomes. Between showings, open houses, client consultations, contract negotiations, and continuing education, you’re easily clearing 750 hours. And unless you’re running another substantial business on the side, real estate is consuming well over 50% of your working hours.

    During my time clerking for Judge Morrison, I saw countless tax cases where high-income earners tried (and failed) to qualify for REPS. They’d claim they were “involved” in real estate, but the IRS would tear apart their time logs. As a licensed Realtor, your MLS activity, transaction records, and broker oversight provide built-in documentation that most taxpayers can’t produce.

    Why This Matters: The Passive Loss Exception

    Under normal circumstances, rental property losses are classified as “passive” (basically, the IRS’s way of saying they don’t count for much). These passive losses can only offset other passive income—not your W-2 wages, 1099 commissions, or active business income.

    But here’s where your real estate license becomes a tax superpower.

    When you qualify as a real estate professional, your rental properties can be reclassified as non-passive activities. This means rental losses can offset your ordinary income—yes, including those fat commission checks you worked so hard for.

    The tax code (specifically IRC §469) creates this exception, and it’s entirely legal. I’ve reviewed more tax provisions than most people have unread emails, and this one actually has teeth. The IRS respects it, courts uphold it, and tax professionals plan around it.

    The Short-Term Rental Game-Changer

    Now let’s talk about why short-term rentals (STRs) take this advantage to another level entirely.

    Traditional long-term rentals, even for real estate professionals, face certain limitations. But STRs have a unique classification under tax law that creates what’s known as the “STR loophole.”

    The 7-Day Rule: If your average guest stay is seven days or fewer, the IRS doesn’t classify your property as a traditional rental activity. Instead, it’s treated more like a business you actively operate.

    Material Participation: For STRs, you only need to materially participate (think hands-on involvement) to treat losses as non-passive. The most practical test? Work at least 100 hours on the property during the year and ensure no one else—including contractors or property managers—works more hours than you do.

    For Realtors who already have REPS, this creates a double advantage. You can combine your professional status with STR material participation to create one of the most powerful tax reduction strategies available.

    The “One Big Beautiful Bill” Makes This Even Better

    Here’s the part that should have every Realtor’s attention: the 2025 tax legislation commonly called the “One Big Beautiful Bill” (OBBB) has restored 100% bonus depreciation for qualifying properties placed in service after January 19, 2025.

    Let me break this down in plain English.

    Normally, when you buy an investment property, you depreciate it over 27.5 years (for residential rentals) or 39 years (for commercial properties). That means you take small, incremental deductions each year. Not exactly exciting.

    But with a cost segregation study—a specialized analysis that identifies components of your property that can be depreciated faster—you can reclassify 20-30% of your property’s value into 5-year or 15-year property categories (think appliances, flooring, fixtures, landscaping).

    With 100% bonus depreciation restored, you can deduct the full value of these accelerated assets in year one.

    Example Scenario: You purchase a $350,000 STR property. A cost segregation study (typically $3,000-$10,000) reveals that $105,000 worth of components qualify for accelerated depreciation. With 100% bonus depreciation, you can deduct that entire $105,000 in the first year—against your active real estate income.

    If you’re in the 35% federal tax bracket, that’s $36,750 in tax savings. In year one. From one property.

    The Math That Changes Everything

    Let’s walk through a practical example using round numbers (and yes, I’ve seen this scenario play out in real life more times than I can count).

    Your Financial Picture:

    • Annual real estate commissions: $200,000
    • Effective tax rate: 35% (federal + state)
    • Tax liability without STR: $70,000

    You Purchase an STR Property:

    • Purchase price: $400,000
    • Cost segregation identifies: $120,000 in accelerated depreciation
    • Additional first-year expenses (furnishing, setup, repairs): $30,000
    • Year 1 rental income: $40,000
    • Operating expenses: $25,000

    Year 1 Tax Impact:

    • Rental income: $40,000
    • Operating expenses: -$25,000
    • Net rental income before depreciation: $15,000
    • Accelerated depreciation (100% bonus): -$120,000
    • Net rental loss: -$105,000

    Because you’re a real estate professional with material participation in your STR, this $105,000 loss offsets your commission income.

    New tax calculation:

    • Adjusted taxable income: $95,000 ($200,000 – $105,000)
    • Tax liability: $33,250
    • Tax savings: $36,750

    That’s a 52% reduction in your tax bill. In one year. Legally.

    The Documentation Requirements (Don’t Skip This Part)

    I know, I know—documentation sounds about as exciting as watching paint dry. But this is where I’ve seen more tax strategies fall apart than anywhere else.

    The IRS has gotten serious about time tracking for real estate professionals. After some high-profile court cases (I’m looking at you, Moss v. Commissioner), the Service now expects contemporaneous logs—meaning you track your time as you work, not when you’re preparing your tax return.

    For Your Real Estate Professional Status:

    • Track all hours spent on real estate activities (MLS research, showings, client meetings, transaction coordination)
    • Maintain a log showing dates, hours, and specific tasks
    • Keep records of MLS activity and closed transactions
    • Document any other businesses or jobs to prove real estate exceeds 50% of your time

    For Your STR Material Participation:

    • Log every hour spent on STR management (guest communication, booking management, maintenance oversight)
    • Track contractor and cleaner hours to ensure you exceed their time
    • Maintain records of all management decisions and involvement
    • Document material participation with emails, calendars, and activity logs

    Yes, this requires discipline. But when it saves you five figures in taxes, it’s worth the administrative hassle. Trust me—explaining to an IRS auditor with poor documentation is far more painful than keeping a simple spreadsheet.

    The Contractor Hours Trap (And How to Avoid It)

    Here’s where many STR owners stumble, and it’s worth addressing directly.

    Remember that 100-hour material participation test? You need to work at least 100 hours AND work more than anyone else on the property. That means if your cleaning crew logs 150 hours, your 100 hours don’t count—you’ve failed the test.

    Smart Strategies to Maintain Control:

    • Reserve high-value tasks for yourself (guest communication, pricing strategy, calendar management)
    • Use contractors efficiently but track their hours carefully
    • For properties requiring heavy cleaning hours, consider bundling services or rotating contractors
    • Focus on tasks that demonstrate management and decision-making, not just physical labor

    One approach I’ve seen work well: handle all guest communications, booking management, and strategic decisions yourself (easily 100+ hours annually), while outsourcing only the physical cleaning and maintenance. This keeps you in the driver’s seat for both hours and control.

    Cost Segregation: Worth the Investment?

    Let’s address the elephant in the room—cost segregation studies typically cost $3,000 to $10,000. Is it worth it?

    Short answer: almost always, yes.

    A proper cost segregation study, conducted by a qualified professional, will identify every component of your property that qualifies for accelerated depreciation. We’re talking about items you’d never think to categorize separately: specialized electrical for appliances, decorative lighting, landscaping features, removable fixtures, even certain flooring materials.

    I’ve reviewed countless cost segregation reports, and even on the conservative end, they typically find 20-30% of the property value qualifies for 5- or 15-year depreciation. On a $400,000 property, that’s $80,000 to $120,000 in accelerated deductions.

    Run the math: even at the low end, $80,000 in deductions at a 35% tax rate saves you $28,000. Spend $5,000 on the study, save $28,000 in taxes—that’s a return on investment most hedge fund managers would envy.

    Other Deductions Realtors Often Miss

    While we’re on the subject of tax benefits, let’s talk about the additional deductions that stack with your STR strategy.

    Standard Realtor Deductions (yes, these still count):

    • Mileage at $0.67 per mile for 2025 (and every showing trip to your STR property counts)
    • Home office expenses if you maintain a dedicated workspace
    • Marketing and advertising costs
    • Professional development and continuing education
    • Client entertainment and meals (within IRS limits)

    STR-Specific Deductions:

    • Furnishings and decor (now potentially 100% deductible year one)
    • Professional photography
    • STR management software and tools
    • Travel to and from the property for management
    • Utilities and internet
    • Property management fees (even if you self-manage through an LLC)

    These deductions stack. Your real estate business generates income that’s offset by your STR losses, while both activities generate legitimate business deductions. It’s a beautiful tax strategy sandwich, and it’s entirely above board.

    Common Questions From Skeptical Realtors

    “Isn’t this too good to be true?”

    I get it—when I first started seeing these numbers in practice, I went back to the tax code three times to make sure I wasn’t missing something. But this isn’t a loophole in the sense of a questionable tax dodge. It’s congressional intent, codified in the tax code, and consistently upheld by courts. The IRS may scrutinize your documentation, but they respect the strategy when properly executed.

    “What if I have a property manager?”

    You can still materially participate even with a property manager, but you need to be strategic. Reserve key decisions for yourself—pricing, calendar management, guest screening, major maintenance decisions. Document these hours carefully. The property manager handles execution; you handle strategy and oversight.

    “Does my license have to be active?”

    Yes. For real estate professional status, you need to be actively working in real property trades or businesses. An inactive license sitting in a drawer won’t cut it. But if you’re reading this and actively selling homes, you’re good to go.

    The Compliance Guardrails

    Let me put on my serious lawyer voice for a moment (the one that comes out after the second single malt, usually accompanied by reading glasses sliding down my nose).

    This strategy is powerful precisely because it’s legitimate. But legitimacy requires compliance. Here’s what that means:

    Keep Immaculate Records: Document everything. Hours, decisions, communications, expenses. The IRS can and will ask.

    Follow the Rules Exactly: Don’t round up your hours. Don’t count activities that don’t qualify. Don’t get creative with the 7-day average. Play it straight.

    Get Professional Help: This isn’t a DIY tax strategy. Work with a CPA who understands real estate professional status and STR tax treatment. The cost of professional guidance is a rounding error compared to the tax savings—and critical if you’re ever audited.

    Plan for Recapture: When you eventually sell the property, some of that depreciation will be “recaptured” and taxed. Plan for this with your tax advisor. It doesn’t eliminate the benefit—it just defers some tax liability.

    The Window of Opportunity

    Here’s the thing that should light a fire under every Realtor reading this: the current tax environment is unusually favorable for STR investors, but it won’t last forever.

    The restoration of 100% bonus depreciation in the “One Big Beautiful Bill” was a political victory, not a permanent fixture of the tax code. Future administrations or congressional sessions could modify or eliminate it. The STR loophole has survived several tax reform attempts, but it’s always on the radar.

    The convergence of:

    • Real estate professional status (for Realtors)
    • STR material participation rules
    • 100% bonus depreciation
    • Cost segregation opportunities

    …creates a unique moment in tax planning. This is as good as it gets.

    Taking Action: Your Next Steps

    If you’re a Realtor and this strategy resonates, here’s how to move forward methodically:

    Step 1: Audit Your Current Tax Position

    • Review last year’s tax return with your CPA
    • Confirm you meet (or can meet) real estate professional status requirements
    • Calculate your potential tax savings from an STR property

    Step 2: Identify the Right Property

    • Look for properties where average stays will be 7 days or less
    • Prioritize locations with strong STR demand
    • Consider properties with high-value components for cost segregation

    Step 3: Set Up Proper Documentation Systems

    • Implement time tracking for both real estate and STR activities
    • Create systems to document all management decisions
    • Track contractor and cleaner hours from day one

    Step 4: Engage Qualified Professionals

    • Work with a CPA experienced in real estate professional status and STR tax treatment
    • Consider a cost segregation specialist for properties over $300,000
    • Consult a tax attorney for complex situations or high-value properties

    Step 5: Execute and Document

    • Purchase the property with tax strategy in mind
    • Conduct cost segregation study in year one
    • Maintain meticulous records throughout the year
    • Review tax impact quarterly with your CPA

    The Bottom Line

    After reviewing countless tax returns and strategies over the years, I can tell you this: the intersection of real estate professional status and short-term rental ownership is one of the few remaining powerful tax strategies that’s both entirely legal and relatively accessible.

    For Realtors, it’s not just accessible—you’ve already done the hardest part. Your license, your hours, your expertise in real estate markets—all of these create a natural foundation for this strategy.

    The question isn’t whether you qualify. If you’re a full-time real estate agent, you almost certainly do. The question is whether you’re willing to be proactive about capturing the tax benefits available to you.

    I’ve seen Realtors reduce six-figure tax bills by 40-60% using this exact approach. Not through aggressive positions or questionable deductions, but through properly structured STR ownership backed by meticulous documentation.

    Your real estate license isn’t just a credential that lets you sell homes. In the right hands, it’s a tax-saving tool that can put tens of thousands of dollars back in your pocket every single year.

    The choice is yours: keep writing checks to the IRS, or invest in an asset that pays you while reducing your tax burden. After clerking for a federal judge and practicing tax law for over a decade, I know which choice I’d make.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Do I need to quit my real estate job to manage an STR full-time?

    Not at all. The beauty of this strategy is that your real estate career actually strengthens your tax position. You need material participation in the STR (100+ hours), but that’s entirely manageable alongside your real estate business. Many Realtors successfully manage 1-3 STR properties while maintaining full-time sales careers.

    What happens if I don’t meet the 750-hour requirement one year?

    Your real estate professional status is determined annually. If you have an unusually slow year and don’t meet the 750-hour threshold, you lose REPS for that year only. However, you may still qualify for the STR loophole through material participation alone (100-hour test), though with some limitations. The key is consistent tracking and documentation.

    Can I use this strategy with multiple STR properties?

    Absolutely. Once you qualify as a real estate professional, you can apply this treatment to multiple STR properties, provided you materially participate in each one. The tax benefits scale—two properties mean double the depreciation, double the deductions, and potentially double the tax savings. Just ensure you’re tracking time and participation separately for each property.

    Is the cost segregation study really necessary?

    It’s not legally required, but it’s practically essential to maximize your tax benefits. Without a cost segregation study, you’re limited to standard depreciation over 27.5 years. The study unlocks the accelerated depreciation that creates those massive first-year deductions. Think of it as spending $5,000 to save $30,000—it’s one of the best returns on investment in tax planning.

    What if the IRS audits me?

    If you’ve maintained proper documentation, an audit is more annoying than dangerous. The IRS may question your time logs, material participation, or the 7-day average—that’s why meticulous record-keeping is non-negotiable. Work with a tax professional who’s experienced with these audits, keep contemporaneous logs, and ensure every claim is defensible. The strategy itself is legally sound; it’s the documentation that makes or breaks an audit.

    This article provides general tax information and should not be considered specific legal or tax advice. Tax laws are complex and subject to change. Always consult with a qualified CPA or tax attorney regarding your specific situation and before implementing any tax strategy.

  • To LLC or Not to LLC? A Guide for Short-Term Rental Owners

    To LLC or Not to LLC? A Guide for Short-Term Rental Owners

    As a short-term rental host, you’ve likely heard the advice: “Put your property in an LLC.” It’s a common refrain in real estate investment circles, and for good reason. A Limited Liability Company (LLC) can be a powerful tool for asset protection. But is it always the right move? The answer, as is often the case in law, is: it depends.

    As a former law clerk with a passion for zoning and housing policy, I’ve seen firsthand the benefits and drawbacks of using an LLC for real estate. This article will break down the pros and cons of holding your short-term rental in an LLC versus your personal name, and explore some simple alternatives for limiting liability.

    The Primary Benefit of an LLC: Limited Liability

    The main reason to put a property into an LLC is to create a legal shield between your business and personal assets. If a guest is injured on your property and sues, a properly structured LLC can protect your personal assets—such as your primary residence, car, and savings—from being targeted in a lawsuit. The liability is generally limited to the assets owned by the LLC, which in many cases is just the rental property itself.

    This protection, however, is not absolute. A court can “pierce the corporate veil” and hold you personally liable if you fail to maintain a strict separation between your personal and business affairs. This could happen, for example, if you commingle personal and business funds, or use the LLC to perpetrate fraud. (See Piercing the Veil in Texas, LoneStarLandLaw.com).

    When to Seriously Consider an LLC

    So, when does it make the most sense to form an LLC for your short-term rental? Here are a few scenarios:

    • You own multiple properties. If you have more than one rental, a Series LLC can be particularly beneficial. A Series LLC is a unique type of LLC that allows you to create separate “series” within the main LLC, each with its own assets and liabilities. This means that a lawsuit related to one property will not affect the others.
    • You have significant personal assets to protect. The more you have to lose, the more valuable the liability protection of an LLC becomes.
    • You’re partnering with others. An LLC provides a clear legal framework for managing a property with co-owners, outlining ownership percentages, responsibilities, and profit distribution in an operating agreement.

    The Downsides of an LLC

    While the liability protection is a major plus, there are some drawbacks to consider:

    • Cost and Complexity: Forming an LLC in Texas involves a $300 filing fee with the Secretary of State. While there’s no annual fee, there are ongoing administrative requirements, such as filing an annual franchise tax report (though most small businesses are exempt from paying the tax). You’ll also need to maintain a separate bank account and records for the LLC.
    • Financing Hurdles: Obtaining a mortgage for an LLC can be more challenging than for an individual. Lenders often view LLCs as higher risk, which can mean higher interest rates and larger down payments. Many investors purchase a property in their personal name and then transfer it to an LLC, but this can trigger a “due-on-sale” clause in the mortgage, allowing the lender to demand full repayment of the loan. (See Due-On-Sale in Texas, LoneStarLandLaw.com).
    • Tax Implications: While LLCs offer pass-through taxation, which avoids the double taxation of corporations, there can be tax complexities. For example, whether you report your rental income on Schedule C or Schedule E of your personal tax return depends on the level of services you provide to your guests. It’s always best to consult with a tax professional to understand the specific implications for your situation. (See IRS Topic No. 415, Renting Residential and Vacation Property).

    Simple Alternatives to an LLC

    If an LLC seems like too much for your current situation, there are other ways to limit your liability:

    • Insurance: A robust insurance policy is a must for any short-term rental owner. A landlord policy with liability coverage is a good start, but an umbrella policy can provide an extra layer of protection for a relatively low cost.
    • Excellent Property Management: Proactively addressing potential hazards on your property is one of the best ways to prevent accidents and lawsuits. Regular maintenance and clear communication with guests can go a long way in mitigating risk.

    The Bottom Line

    Deciding whether to put your short-term rental in an LLC is a significant decision that depends on your individual circumstances. For those with multiple properties or substantial personal assets, the liability protection of an LLC is often well worth the cost and administrative effort. However, for a single-property owner with adequate insurance, personal ownership may be a simpler and more cost-effective option.

    Before making a final decision, I strongly recommend consulting with a qualified attorney and a tax professional to discuss your specific situation and goals.

    Want to stay informed, sign up for our email list.

    StaySTRa Insider
    Name
  • Parsing Airbnb’s Congressional Campaign: What Regulatory Reform Really Means for Short-Term Rentals

    Parsing Airbnb’s Congressional Campaign: What Regulatory Reform Really Means for Short-Term Rentals

    Parsing Airbnb’s Congressional Campaign: What Regulatory Reform Really Means for Short-Term Rentals

    Imagine you’re a host eagerly awaiting regulatory clarity—one that could affect whether you keep your listing open, expand your portfolio, or exit entirely. Enter the latest development: Airbnb publicly urging Congress to reform federal short-term rental (STR) laws, arguing that modernized rules will simultaneously support affordable housing and increase opportunities for hosts. That’s no small claim. But what’s underneath the headlines, and who really stands to benefit?

    Airbnb’s Push: Reading Between the Lines

    According to a recent Reuters article, Airbnb is lobbying for Congress to overhaul STR regulations. Their pitch: clear, up-to-date rules will encourage responsible hosting, expand access to housing (by, as Airbnb argues, increasing supply for families at various income levels), and support individuals who rely on STR income.

    From a legal vantage, this marks a significant shift. For over a decade, STR rules have chiefly been a local affair. Cities and counties, invoking their zoning and police powers, have created an intricate patchwork—some banning non-owner-occupied rentals outright, others capping the number of STRs or imposing steep taxes.[^1]

    Airbnb’s call for federal action signals a new front in the regulatory debate. It’s also a test of how federal preemption (the principle that federal law can override conflicting state or local ordinances) might come into play. If Congress adopts new rules, localities could find their own stricter laws challenged or nullified, at least in part.[^2]

    Affordability: The Great Legal Tension

    Airbnb’s positioning—framing STR reform as a solution to affordable housing—is, to put it gently, controversial. Many housing advocates and some city officials argue precisely the opposite: that STRs convert long-term rental supply into short-term profits, thereby decreasing housing availability for locals and driving up rents.[^3] In contrast, Airbnb claims that streamlined rules would create certainty, encourage better compliance, and—through regulatory innovation—potentially yield new affordable options.

    The legal landscape here is anything but settled. Studies on STRs’ impact on affordability have yielded mixed results, often varying by market size and regulatory regime.[^4] Local court cases, such as the challenge to New York City’s Local Law 18, underscore the high stakes and legal ambiguity: judges have both upheld and struck down regulations on constitutional and statutory grounds (often hinging on property rights or due process arguments).

    Congressional Action: What’s Realistically on the Table?

    Airbnb’s campaign brings a new twist to the table, but actual federal legislation faces formidable headwinds. Congress historically defers to local authorities on zoning and local land use. Any federal intervention will be legislatively complex—likely comprising broad guidelines rather than detailed preemption of local rules.

    What could Congress do if it acts at all? Possible scenarios include:

    • Mandating basic regulatory transparency and fairness for STR hosts (think: notice-and-hearing protections reminiscent of due process)[^5]
    • Funding pilot programs with data-gathering on housing impacts
    • Creating incentives for local governments to adopt “best practice” licensing frameworks
    • Limiting local bans only where they conflict with federally defined economic rights, though this is a legal minefield

    Who Wins? A Balanced Legal Perspective

    While Airbnb frames reforms as a win-win, not all stakeholders agree. Key groups to watch:

    • Hosts and Homeowners: Clear, reasonably uniform standards would offer predictability and potentially more security for those who depend on STR income.
    • Renters and Communities: Some fear that weaker local control could mean more STRs and upward pressure on rents. Others argue a well-regulated STR sector could supplement affordable housing, if paired with creative legal tools (like inclusionary zoning or STR surcharges earmarked for housing funds).
    • Local Governments: Risk losing flexibility to tailor policies to community character, but gain relief from costly legal battles over unclear or conflicting rules.

    Closing Thoughts: The Rulebook Is Still Being Written

    This isn’t merely another industry lobbying effort. It’s a sign that the battle over STR regulation—and its implications for affordable housing, local power, and property rights—is headed for Congress. What happens next may well reshape the legal framework for years to come.

    For hosts, investors, and concerned neighbors alike: stay tuned and stay skeptical—regulation is a reflection of shifting community values and national priorities. In such a complex field, awareness and engagement are your strongest legal tools.

    Curious what your own property might yield under the currents of future reform? Check out the StaySTRa Analyzer to forecast your possibilities.

    Want to continue following the legal pulse of the STR world? Join our StaySTRa Insider mailing list for updates that cut through the noise.

    [^1]: See, e.g., Santa Monica Ordinance No. 2508 (2015), New York City Local Law 18 (2022).
    [^2]: For reference, see the Supremacy Clause in the U.S. Constitution, Article VI, Clause 2; also, congressional “preemption” in local land use generally requires explicit statutory language—rare and highly contested.
    [^3]: Evidence is mixed. See Barron, K., Kung, E., & Proserpio, D. (2023). “The Effect of Home-Sharing on House Prices and Rents: Evidence from Airbnb.” Marketing Science, 42(1), 1-27.
    [^4]: For example, compare impacts shown in large metro areas (where STRs have a modest effect) to rural markets (which see minimal impact).
    [^5]: See Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970) for procedural due process standards.

    StaySTRa Insider
    Name

  • Balancing Act: What New STR Regulations in Major U.S. Cities Signal for Hosts and Communities

    Balancing Act: What New STR Regulations in Major U.S. Cities Signal for Hosts and Communities

    Imagine waking up to new rules on your biggest investment

    For thousands of short-term rental (STR) hosts, that’s precisely the scenario unfolding as several major U.S. cities roll out updated regulations for 2024. These rules—ranging from tighter licensing to limits on how many days per year you can rent a property—reflect an evolving national debate: how do we encourage economic innovation without destabilizing housing markets or community cohesion?

    What’s Motivating This Regulatory Wave?

    At the heart of the new ordinances is a familiar tension: cities want to support tourism and gig-economy entrepreneurship, but mounting worries about neighborhood disruption and rising rents have forced action. In my experience, having pored over countless city council agendas, this pattern is almost inevitable when STR proliferation intersects with affordability concerns. Municipal leaders are responding to:

    • Housing Supply Pressure: Critics argue rampant STRs remove valuable long-term housing, worsening shortages.
    • Neighborhood Stability: Frequent turnover of transient guests can change the character of residential areas.
    • Public Calls for Clarity: Ambiguous or poorly enforced rules benefit no one—least of all responsible operators looking for predictability.

    Key Features of the New Rules

    While the specifics vary by city, I’ve noted these major trends across the latest regulations:

    1. Stricter Licensing and Registration:
      • Mandatory registration with annual renewals, plus fines for non-compliance.
    2. Rental Day Caps:
      • Some cities are imposing hard limits—anywhere from 60 to 180 days a year.
    3. “Primary Residence” Requirements:
      • In many cases, you must live in the property to list it short-term. (This effectively means investors can’t turn whole neighborhoods into de facto hotels.)
    4. Transparency Provisions:
      • Hosting platforms are compelled to share listing data with regulators.

    These approaches ensure cities regain a level of monitoring that, for years, lagged behind rapid STR expansion. Yet, as always, the law is a slow-moving barge catching up to a nimble speedboat (the rental market).

    Legal and Practical Implications

    For hosts and investors, several issues warrant close attention:

    • Increased Compliance Costs: Application fees, licensing, reporting obligations, and new insurance requirements can add up quickly.
    • Uncertain Investment Landscape: Stricter caps particularly challenge those who purchased homes intending full-time short-term rentals, especially in high-demand urban cores.
    • Due Process and Enforcement: Cities are refining procedures to address illegal listings fairly, but due process concerns remain if enforcement accelerates too rapidly or unevenly.

    On the flip side, housing advocates point out that these rules are a (potentially overdue) reassertion of community priorities—and could open doors for more residents to access affordable housing again.

    What It Means for the Broader STR Ecosystem

    Here’s my legal bottom line: We are witnessing a reset moment. The regulatory pendulum, long swinging toward laissez-faire innovation, is correcting in favor of predictability and protection for neighborhoods. Lawsuits and pilot programs will follow, and no two cities will land in the same place. But if you’re a property owner, now is the time to:

    • Review your city’s new ordinances in detail (or let a tool like StaySTRa Analyzer do the heavy lifting);
    • Rethink investment models that depend on non-owner occupancy;
    • Track possible legal challenges, as courts will soon test the boundaries of these new regulations.[^1]

    One certainty remains: STR laws will continue to reflect the evolving push and pull between economic opportunity and community stability. Hosts, investors, and residents alike should remain vigilant—because today’s pilot program could be tomorrow’s permanent rule.

    [^1]: For further reading, see “City of Boston v. Airbnb, Inc., 386 F. Supp. 3d 113 (D. Mass. 2019),” which explores the city’s authority to require platforms to share data and delist unregistered rentals.

    Stay informed—subscribe to the StaySTRa Insider for the latest updates on legal developments, data trends, and actionable strategies for STR success.

    StaySTRa Insider
    Name

  • The Legal Chessboard of STRs: How Regulatory Power Plays Shape Airbnb’s—and Your—Future

    The Legal Chessboard of STRs: How Regulatory Power Plays Shape Airbnb’s—and Your—Future

    The Short-Term Rental Regulatory Crossroads

    Imagine waking up as a short-term rental (STR) host and finding new regulations have shaken your business overnight—a scenario more common in today’s landscape than many realize. As recent news coverage highlights,^1 the future of platforms like Airbnb is now inextricably tied not just to market demand, but to political maneuvering and legislative tides.

    Policy Uncertainty Becomes Business Risk

    Why does the STR market feel like a high-stakes poker game? Because the rules—or, more often, the rulemakers—are in flux. Cities and states across the U.S. are re-evaluating how they balance:

    • The economic benefits of STRs (increased tourism, extra income for homeowners)
    • The housing supply issue (concern that STRs reduce availability of long-term rentals for locals)
    • The complaints of neighbors (noise, traffic, changing neighborhood character)

    The result is an unpredictable policy environment, where yesterday’s green light could turn red without warning.

    Airbnb’s Political Gambit: From Passive Platform to Active Lobbyist

    It’s no secret that Airbnb—and its peers—are shifting tactics, moving from reactive compliance to proactive regulation-shaping.[^2] They’re spending more on lobbying, supporting ballot measures, and even collaborating with sympathetic policymakers.

    Legal translation: The very legality of short-term rentals may increasingly hinge on political alliances and advocacy, not just zoning codes. Municipalities are no longer only negotiating with individual hosts; they’re facing formidable corporate actors.

    Impacts on Investors and Hosts: Reading the Room (and the Law)

    For hosts and would-be investors, this makes the STR field resemble a chessboard more than a craps table. Success will hinge on:

    1. Due diligence: Before buying or listing, scrutinize local laws, draft ordinances, and council meeting minutes (yes, you read that right—sometimes enforcement intent lives in the footnotes of committee reports).
    2. Flexibility: Regulations can carve up cities into permitting zones or cap the number/frequency of STRs—meaning income projections must be scenario-based, not wishful thinking. Using tools like StaySTRa Analyzer can help quantify different risk/reward outcomes.
    3. Staying informed: Political winds shift quickly; what’s allowed this year may be restricted next. Watch for proposed changes—not just enacted ones—because once public commentary closes, options to adapt may already be limited.

    Bigger-Than-You: STR Policy is a Community Conversation

    Ultimately, STR regulation debates tap into fundamental questions: What kinds of neighborhoods do we want? Who gets to profit from community assets like housing? These are not easily resolved, and the answer will evolve with public sentiment as much as legal briefs.

    For the hosts, investors, and travelers navigating these waters, empowerment comes from vigilance: track not only the market, but the political and legal landscape shaping it.

    Staying attuned is key—because in the STR chess game, even pawns can become kings.

    Want more legal and market insights like this? Join the StaySTRa Insider and never miss a regulatory move.

    [^2]: See Bloomberg, “Airbnb’s lobbying blitz” (June 2023); various city council lobbying records.

    StaySTRa Insider
    Name

  • Beyond the Waterfront: A Legal Guide to Short-Term Rental Rules in Canyon Lake

    Beyond the Waterfront: A Legal Guide to Short-Term Rental Rules in Canyon Lake

    Operating a short-term rental (STR) in the scenic Canyon Lake area of Texas presents a regulatory landscape far more complex than many property owners initially assume. From my experience analyzing zoning laws, a common yet costly mistake is believing that a property’s postal address dictates its governing body. While your property may indeed have a “Canyon Lake” address, it is crucial to understand that a multi-layered governance structure is at play, and the rules are not always what they seem.

    A frequent misconception is that properties strictly within Canyon Lake are exempt from the stringent regulations of the City of New Braunfels. However, the legal reality is more intricate. Successful operation requires a nuanced understanding of a tripartite governance model involving the City of New Braunfels, Comal County, and a special taxing district known as W.O.R.D.. Let’s dissect the role each entity plays.

    The City of New Braunfels: The Primary Gatekeeper

    Counterintuitive as it may seem, the City of New Braunfels often serves as the primary gatekeeper for STRs in the region, even for many properties with a Canyon Lake address. This is due to the city’s extensive Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ)—a designated buffer area outside the formal city limits where the municipality’s ordinances on matters like subdivision and zoning can still apply.

    The city’s authority is the first and most significant hurdle for any prospective operator.

    • Restrictive Zoning: The City of New Braunfels expressly prohibits short-term rentals in all residentially zoned districts. This single ordinance renders a vast number of single-family homes in the area ineligible for legal STR operation.
    • Mandatory Permitting: For properties in the few non-residential zones where STRs are allowed, the city manages a comprehensive permitting process, including applications, inspections, and renewals. In some cases, a costly and arduous Special Use Permit (SUP) process, involving public hearings before the City Council, is required.

    Before any other step, an owner must consult the city’s official Short Term Rental Map to determine if a property is eligible for any type of STR permit.

    Comal County: Guardian of Environmental Health and Public Nuisance

    While the city handles operational permitting, Comal County enforces critical regulations, particularly in unincorporated areas that may not have municipal services. The county’s authority is most acutely felt in two areas:

    • On-Site Sewage Facilities (OSSF): This is a critical, and often overlooked, compliance point. The Comal County Engineer’s Office (CCEO) treats the conversion of a single-family home to a commercial STR as a “change in use”. If the number of guests you advertise online exceeds the original design capacity of your septic system, you may be required to obtain a new commercial OSSF permit and install a costly upgraded system. This is not a suggestion; it is a mandate backed by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ).
    • Nuisance Abatement: The county’s Environmental Enforcement division is responsible for investigating complaints regarding public nuisances like improper trash disposal, which can be common issues associated with STRs. For noise complaints, the Comal County Sheriff’s Office is the responding authority.

    The Water Oriented Recreation District (W.O.R.D.): The Specialized Taxing Authority

    The third entity every STR operator in the Canyon Lake area must engage with is W.O.R.D.. It is essential to understand that W.O.R.D. does not issue operational permits; it is a special district whose purpose is to collect a specific lodging user fee (a tax) to fund local environmental and recreational improvements.

    All STRs within W.O.R.D.’s boundaries must:

    • Obtain a Revenue (Tax) Permit: This is a free, one-time registration that provides you with a W.O.R.D. permit number. The individual homeowner is responsible for obtaining this permit, even if a platform like Airbnb remits taxes on their behalf.
    • Collect and Remit a 3% Lodging User Fee: This tax is levied on your gross rental income and is paid quarterly to W.O.R.D..
    • Display the Permit Number in All Advertisements: This is a crucial and easily verifiable rule. Your W.O.R.D. permit number (e.g., “WP# L1234”) must be included in any online listing for your property on sites like Airbnb or Vrbo. Failure to do so immediately signals non-compliance.

    A Word to the Wise

    Navigating the regulatory maze for a Canyon Lake STR is a task that demands meticulous due diligence. The assumption that a property is governed solely by a single, permissive “county” jurisdiction is a pathway to significant financial and legal risk. The authority of the City of New Braunfels, through its ETJ and restrictive zoning, is paramount. The county’s OSSF regulations can trigger unexpected capital expenditures, and W.O.R.D. adds a mandatory layer of tax registration and compliance. Legal and profitable operation in this market is achievable, but it is contingent upon a nuanced understanding of this multi-layered system and strict adherence to the rules of each governing body.

    Sign up for our new letter

    Name
  • Parsing Pittsfield: What Do New Short-Term Rental Limits Really Mean for Hosts and Communities?

    Parsing Pittsfield: What Do New Short-Term Rental Limits Really Mean for Hosts and Communities?

    Setting the Stage: Pittsfield’s Regulatory Pivot

    Imagine opening up your Pittsfield home for summer travelers, only to find the rules of the game changed mid-season. This scenario is unfolding for many local hosts as Pittsfield, Massachusetts moves closer to adopting a comprehensive ordinance to legalize and regulate short-term rentals (STRs)—a patch of ground long tussled over by property owners, would-be investors, and wary neighbors. The recent deliberations of the Ordinance and Rules Committee offer a glimpse into both the city’s aspirations and its anxieties around the sharing economy.

    What Are the Proposed Rules?

    The working draft of Pittsfield’s new STR rules, as reported in the Berkshire Eagle[^1], contains two particularly consequential provisions:

    • Ownership Cap: Limits how many short-term rental units a single operator can legally control. While specifics are still being debated, the direction is clear: no one can amass an unchecked STR empire.
    • Rental Day Cap: Sets a ceiling for how many days per year a given unit may be rented out as a short-term rental. This is likely to distinguish between owner-occupied properties (where the host lives on-site) and non-owner-occupied investment properties.

    Translation: If you own two investment condos, you might soon need to choose which one takes center stage in the summer—and for how long.

    Legal and Policy Rationale—And the Tensions Beneath

    These rules are not plucked from thin air. Municipalities across the U.S. are wrestling with the dual imperatives to support tourism and preserve neighborhood character. Here’s why the typical legal justifications matter:

    • Limiting negative externalities: Multiple STRs in the hands of a few can fundamentally alter residential blocks—more transient visitors, less community cohesion.
    • Housing preservation: Policymakers worry that unchecked STR proliferation could reduce the pool of available long-term rentals or drive up housing costs for locals.
    • Leveling the playing field: Rules ensure that both part-time hosts and large investors are subject to similar standards—at least in theory.

    Yet, as any city attorney or planning commissioner will tell you, balancing these goals is no simple feat. Too lax, and you risk corporate dominance; too strict, and you undermine legitimate small-scale hosting (and local spending).

    Key Takeaways for Hosts and Investors

    • Expect More Oversight: If you operate more than one STR property, new restrictions will likely require you to restructure your business model or downsize.
    • Seasonal Constraints: For secondary homes, especially ski and summer properties, a cap on rental days could sharply curtail peak season income—and the calculation for potential buyers shifts accordingly. (Our StaySTRa Analyzer can help model these scenarios.)
    • Enforcement Is Everything: The effectiveness of these rules will hinge on how the city monitors compliance (think: registration databases, permitting, and complaints hotlines). This is where legal language meets practical reality.

    Broader Context—Are These Rules Fair and Effective?

    Here the legal commentary becomes a bit more nuanced. Caps on ownership and rental days are blunt policy instruments—easy to understand, but sometimes hard to calibrate. Do they really help local renters, or end up penalizing resident hosts and modest investors? Is a cap of 60, 90, or 120 days the sweet spot—or merely a political compromise?

    Judicial trends suggest that, so long as a city can show it acted to advance a legitimate governmental interest and the rules aren’t arbitrarily enforced, courts usually uphold these types of ordinances.[^2] That means, for better or worse, local policymakers have considerable discretion.

    Looking Ahead: The Importance of Transparency and Public Input

    Pittsfield’s process—public meetings, debate, and visible committee work—is a textbook example of how these rules should take shape. The outcome will reflect not just legal constraints, but the values and priorities of the people who live there.

    Residents, hosts, and would-be investors should stay engaged. After all, regulations are ultimately a reflection of community values, so staying informed—and participating in public comment—is essential.

    Stay up to date on STR rules and local ordinances by joining our mailing list, the StaySTRa Insider. It’s your best tool for navigating an evolving legal landscape.

    [^1]: Cassandra Yany, “Short-term rental rules are taking shape in Pittsfield, including limits on ownership,” Berkshire Eagle, June 2024. https://www.berkshireeagle.com/news/centralberkshires/short-term-rental-rules-take-shape-in-pittsfield/article25c92b22-2ca0-4702-91a9-87846789020d.html
    [^2]: See, e.g., Barron v. City of Baltimore, 588 F.Supp.3d 759 (D. Md. 2022) (upholding local STR restrictions as rationally related to legitimate interests).

    StaySTRa Insider
    Name

  • A Permanent Tax Windfall: New Law Cements 100% Bonus Depreciation for STR Investors

    A Permanent Tax Windfall: New Law Cements 100% Bonus Depreciation for STR Investors

    A seismic shift in federal tax policy now offers a generational opportunity for sophisticated real estate investors. The government recently enacted the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA), which does more than just prevent the expiration of prior tax cuts.¹ In fact, it fundamentally rewrites the playbook for capital-intensive ventures. As a result, Short-Term Rental (STR) investors are positioned as primary beneficiaries.

    At the heart of this legislative overhaul is a key provision. It transforms a temporary tax incentive into a permanent structural advantage. Specifically, the law restores 100% first-year bonus depreciation. For the discerning investor, this change means you can convert a significant portion of an STR acquisition or renovation cost into an immediate and substantial tax deduction. Consequently, this creates an unparalleled strategic advantage.

    The New Certainty: Permanent 100% Bonus Depreciation

    To appreciate the significance of this act, you must recall the landscape investors previously faced. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) first introduced the powerful tool of 100% bonus depreciation. This allowed investors to write off the full cost of certain assets in year one. However, this benefit had a built-in expiration date. For instance, the deduction percentage dropped to 80% in 2023 and fell again to 60% in 2024. It was scheduled to plummet to a mere 40% in 2025.²

    This declining schedule created enormous uncertainty for investors. It also diminished the after-tax return on capital projects with each passing year. Fortunately, the OBBBA has not just paused this countdown; it has dismantled the clock entirely. Effective for property placed in service after January 19, 2025, the law permanently sets the rate for first-year bonus depreciation at 100%.³ This grants investors a stable, predictable foundation for long-term financial modeling. Ultimately, this certainty is a crucial element for building a scalable real estate portfolio.

    Your Blueprint for Unlocking Massive Tax Savings

    The restoration of 100% bonus depreciation is a powerful development. However, you cannot unlock its full potential automatically. Instead, it requires a deliberate, multi-step strategy that navigates specific sections of the Internal Revenue Code. For an STR investor, this means you must transform a typically “passive” real estate investment into a non-passive business in the eyes of the IRS. This approach allows the resulting tax losses to offset your active income, such as W-2 wages.

    From my experience analyzing tax statutes, the most successful investors treat tax compliance with the same rigor as property acquisition. This strategy, while highly effective, demands meticulous execution.

    Step 1: Mandate a Cost Segregation Study

    First, you must understand that bonus depreciation applies only to specific components of a property. It does not apply to the entire structure. The residential building itself requires a lengthy 27.5-year depreciation schedule. Therefore, a Cost Segregation Study is the essential, engineering-based analysis to identify and reclassify property components into shorter-lived asset classes.⁴ These valuable classes include:

    • 5-Year Property: Covers furniture, appliances, carpeting, and decorative items.
    • 15-Year Property: Includes land improvements like driveways, fencing, and landscaping.

    A professional study can often reclassify 20-30% of a property’s purchase price (excluding land) into these categories. This, in turn, creates a large pool of assets now eligible for immediate, 100% expensing under the new law. Without this study, an investor has no defensible basis for maximizing this important deduction.

    Step 2: Leverage the “Short-Term Rental Loophole”

    By default, the IRS classifies all rental activities as “passive.” This classification means any tax losses they generate are trapped. For example, they can only offset passive income, not your primary salary.⁵ This is where the “STR Loophole” comes into play. A specific exception in the tax code (IRS Publication 925) states that an activity is not a rental if the average period of customer use is seven days or less.⁶

    By ensuring your property’s average guest stay meets this 7-day threshold, you move the activity out of the automatic passive category. The IRS now considers it a trade or business. As a result, this opens the door for you to treat its losses as fully deductible.

    Step 3: Document Your Material Participation

    Once your STR qualifies as a business, you must clear one final hurdle. You must prove you “materially participated” in that business. This is an IRS standard defined as involvement that is regular, continuous, and substantial. An investor only needs to meet one of seven tests. The three most common tests for STR owners are:

    1. The 500-Hour Test: You (and your spouse) participate for more than 500 hours during the year.
    2. The 100-Hour Test: You participate for more than 100 hours, and no other single individual (like a cleaner) participates more than you.
    3. The Substantially All Test: Your participation constitutes nearly all of the work done for the rental.⁷

    Meticulous, contemporaneous documentation of your time is non-negotiable. Should an audit occur, these detailed records are your primary defense.

    The Bottom Line: A Quantifiable Windfall for Your Portfolio

    The combination of these elements creates a profound impact on an investor’s cash flow. To illustrate, consider this simplified case study:

    • The Investment: An investor buys an STR property for $600,000, with a $500,000 basis for the building and its improvements.
    • Cost Segregation: A study identifies $150,000 (30%) of that basis as 5- and 15-year property.
    • The Investor: A high-income earner in a 32% tax bracket who materially participates in the STR.

    Under the Old Law (40% Bonus Depreciation): The year-one depreciation deduction would have been about $90,121. This would generate a tax savings of roughly $28,839.

    Under the New OBBBA (100% Bonus Depreciation): Now, the investor can deduct the full $150,000 of qualifying assets in year one, plus standard depreciation on the building. This action brings the total year-one deduction to a staggering $162,121. Consequently, it generates a tax savings of $51,879.

    This single legislative change puts an additional $23,040 of cash back into the investor’s pocket in the first year alone. This capital, which taxes would have otherwise consumed, can now work for you. For instance, you can use it to pay down the mortgage, fund further renovations, or acquire your next property. It dramatically improves key metrics like cash-on-cash return and accelerates capital velocity for portfolio growth.

    Furthermore, for investors planning renovations, the math is even more compelling. You can immediately write off the entire cost of qualifying improvements, like new kitchens and furnishings. This effectively provides a government-subsidized “rebate” on the project equal to your marginal tax rate. This creates a powerful incentive to acquire “value-add” properties where you can create new, depreciable assets.

    In conclusion, this new tax framework is a game-changer. It rewards not only savvy acquisition but also diligent operation. For the STR investor willing to master the details, the OBBBA provides a clear, permanent, and exceptionally powerful path to wealth creation.

    Footnotes:

    • ¹ H.R. 1, the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA), enacted July 4, 2025.
    • ² Internal Revenue Code § 168(k). The pre-OBBBA phase-out schedule reduced the bonus depreciation percentage to 40% in 2025, 20% in 2026, and 0% thereafter.
    • ³ Per the final version of the OBBBA, the 100% rate is effective for qualified property acquired and placed in service after January 19, 2025.
    • ⁴ A Cost Segregation Study is a detailed, engineering-based analysis that taxpayers use to identify and reclassify assets, thereby accelerating depreciation deductions.
    • ⁵ Internal Revenue Code § 469 establishes the Passive Activity Loss (PAL) rules.
    • ⁶ IRS Publication 925, Passive Activity and At-Risk Rules. The “7-day rule” is a key exception to the definition of a rental activity.
    • ⁷ The seven tests for material participation are outlined in Treas. Reg. § 1.469-5T. Meticulous record-keeping is crucial for substantiating any claim of material participation.

    Legal Disclaimer: Please note that the content of this article is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as, and should not be construed as, legal or tax advice. The tax laws and regulations are complex and subject to change. We strongly recommend that you consult with your own qualified attorney and CPA to address your specific situation before making any financial or investment decisions.

  • How to Qualify for the STR Loophole: A Legal & Policy Guide

    How to Qualify for the STR Loophole: A Legal & Policy Guide

    In the world of real estate investing, few tax strategies are as potent—or as misunderstood—as the Short-Term Rental (STR) loophole. This provision in the tax code allows investors to take what would normally be “passive losses” from a rental property and convert them into “non-passive losses.” The result? You can use these significant paper losses, often generated by depreciation, to directly offset high-taxed active income from a W-2 salary or another business venture.

    However, from my time clerking and analyzing complex housing statutes, I can attest that powerful benefits are always paired with strict requirements. Qualifying is not a passive activity; it requires a deliberate, two-part strategy grounded in the Internal Revenue Code. This guide will walk you through exactly how to qualify, breaking down the process into clear, actionable steps.

    The Gateway: Reclassifying Your Rental as a Business

    The first and most fundamental step is to move your property outside the IRS’s default classification for rentals. Under Section 469 of the tax code, all rental activities are automatically considered “passive.” This “per se passive” rule is what normally prevents you from using rental losses to reduce your active income. To bypass this, your STR must meet a specific exception that reclassifies it as a trade or business.

    Meeting the 7-Day Rule

    The most common and straightforward path to achieving this reclassification is the 7-day rule. Found within IRS Treasury Regulations, this exception states that an activity is not considered a rental activity if:

    The average period of customer use for such property is seven days or less.¹

    To calculate this, you divide the total number of days your property was rented during the year by the total number of separate rentals (i.e., individual guest stays). If the result is 7.0 or less, you have successfully cleared the first hurdle. Your STR is no longer treated as a passive rental by default; it is now viewed as a business, like a hotel. This distinction is the key that unlocks the door to the loophole.

    A Note on the 30-Day Rule: A secondary exception exists if the average stay is 30 days or less and you provide “significant personal services.” These are services beyond basic property management, such as providing meals or daily cleaning, which is less common for typical Airbnb or Vrbo hosts. Therefore, the 7-day rule remains the primary target for most investors.

    The Final Hurdle: Proving Material Participation

    Once your STR is treated as a business, you must prove that you are a material participant in that business. Simply owning the asset is not enough. The IRS defines material participation as involvement that is **”regular, continuous, and substantial.”**² To meet this standard, you only need to satisfy one of seven tests outlined by the IRS for the tax year.

    While all seven are available, three are most relevant and commonly used by hands-on STR investors.

    Test 1: The 500-Hour Test

    This is often considered the safest harbor. You qualify if:

    You participated in the activity for more than 500 hours during the tax year.

    This is a high bar, equating to roughly 10 hours of work per week. The good news is that your spouse’s hours can be combined with yours to meet this threshold. This test is best for those heavily involved in managing multiple properties or a single, high-turnover rental.

    Test 2: The “Substantially All” Test

    This test is useful for investors who are true solo operators. You qualify if:

    Your participation was substantially all the participation in the activity of all individuals for the tax year.

    This means you do virtually everything yourself—guest communications, marketing, supply runs, and even the cleaning and maintenance. If you have a regular cleaner or handyman, you will likely not meet this test.

    Test 3: The 100-Hour Test (And More Than Anyone Else)

    This is the most common and strategic test for many STR investors who self-manage but also use contractors. You qualify if:

    You participated in the activity for more than 100 hours during the tax year, and that participation is not less than the participation of any other single individual.

    To pass this test, you must track not only your own hours but also the hours worked by each contractor. For example, if you log 150 hours, you must ensure that your primary cleaner, your go-to handyman, or any other single person did not work more than 150 hours on your property. Using multiple cleaners instead of one dedicated cleaner can be a useful strategy here.

    The Non-Negotiable Element: Meticulous Documentation

    The IRS is fully aware of the significant tax benefits this strategy provides. Consequently, claims of material participation are a point of intense scrutiny during an audit. The burden of proof rests entirely on you, the taxpayer.

    Failure to document your hours is legally equivalent to not having participated at all.

    While the IRS does not mandate a specific format, your proof must be established by “any reasonable means.”³ This means keeping contemporaneous records. Do not wait until the end of the year to estimate your time. Best practices include:

    • Time-Tracking Logs: Use a spreadsheet, calendar, or a dedicated app (like Clockify or REPS Tracker) to log the date, hours spent, and a description of the task.
    • Supporting Evidence: Keep emails, text messages with guests and contractors, and receipts for supply runs. These create a verifiable paper trail that supports your time log.

    By successfully navigating these two stages—reclassifying the property as a business via the 7-day rule and then proving your material participation with robust documentation—you fully qualify for the STR loophole. This allows you to take the powerful paper losses from depreciation (especially when accelerated by a cost segregation study) and apply them directly against your other income, generating substantial, immediate tax savings.

    Footnotes:

    • ¹ Treas. Reg. § 1.469-1T(e)(3)(ii)(A). This regulation provides the specific exceptions to the term “rental activity.”
    • ² The concept of “material participation” is defined under Internal Revenue Code § 469(h).
    • ³ Treas. Reg. § 1.469-5T(f)(4) outlines the methods by which a taxpayer can establish the extent of their participation in an activity.

    Legal Disclaimer: Please note that the content of this article is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as, and should not be construed as, legal or tax advice. The tax laws and regulations are complex and subject to change. We strongly recommend that you consult with your own qualified attorney and CPA to address your specific situation before making any financial or investment decisions.

  • Juneau’s STR Task Force: Incremental Tweaks, Not Sweeping Caps – A Legal Analysis

    Juneau’s STR Task Force: Incremental Tweaks, Not Sweeping Caps – A Legal Analysis

    Imagine: The Uncapped STR Landscape in Juneau

    Picture yourself as a Juneau homeowner eyeing the prospect of launching a second (or third) short-term rental. Historically, such ambitions often run afoul of strict unit limits or outright bans—rules familiar to anyone following the national debate over short-term rentals (STRs). However, following months of deliberation, Juneau’s STR task force proposes a considerably lighter regulatory touch than seen in many comparable markets[^1].

    Rule Adjustments: What’s Actually Changing?

    The task force’s recommendations, as reported by the Juneau Empire, focus on refining existing rules rather than upending the status quo. Three key proposals stand out:

    1. Allowing Multiple STRs per Dwelling: Current restrictions often limit one STR per parcel or owner-occupied unit. The new language would permit more than one STR in a single dwelling, a departure from the trends in tighter markets on the Lower 48.
    2. No Cap on Units per Owner: Crucially, property owners would not face a limit on the number of units or properties they can operate as STRs. In legal terms, this preserves operational scalability—a boon for small-scale investors or legacy owners.
    3. Grandfathering Period: The recommendations include a period allowing existing hosts to comply with new requirements—blunting the impact of regulatory surprise and providing stability during the transition.

    Interpretive Nuances: Why No Cap, and What Could It Mean?

    While many cities have deployed caps as both a housing preservation tool and political expedient, Juneau’s task force has explicitly declined to do so. This decision underscores a few local legal and policy calculations:

    • Population and Housing Pressures: Juneau, with its unique geographic constraints and smaller population, faces pressures distinct from larger urban hubs. A cap, often justified as protecting long-term rental supply, may have little policy payoff given market data[^2].
    • Legal Certainty and Investor Confidence: By providing a grandfathering clause and avoiding abrupt economic impacts, Juneau is minimizing the legal risk of takings claims—a long-standing issue when municipalities restrict property rights too suddenly.
    • Administrative Feasibility: Enforcing a cap creates administrative burdens and contention. Grandfathering and flexible unit allowances are, in practice, easier to implement and enforce.

    The Grandfathering Clause – More Than Just a Grace Period

    Grandfathering means allowing existing operators to continue under old rules even as new restrictions take effect. Legally, it can blunt accusations of retroactive enforcement and reduce litigation risk for the city. From my time drafting local housing codes, I’ve seen how such clauses can make or break the public acceptance of new regulations.

    What Hosts and Investors Should Watch For

    While these recommendations are non-binding until adopted as ordinance, their direction suggests:

    • Fewer Regulatory Shocks: Operators can expect more predictable ground rules.
    • Potential for Policy Dial-backs: As with any task force proposal, recommendations can be amended before adoption. Watch public hearings and council meetings closely[^3].
    • Continued Collection of Local Data: If STR-driven housing shortages do emerge, future policymakers can always revisit caps or other more stringent interventions.

    Conclusion: Is Juneau Charting a Pragmatic Middle Path?

    Whereas many municipalities are responding to STR concerns with aggressive restrictions, Juneau’s task force appears to favor incrementalism—adjusting for practicality without foreclosing economic opportunity. In the end, regulations are a reflection of local priorities and market realities. For Juneau, the current moment seems to call for cautious adaptation over sweeping change.

    For more on how proposed rules can impact your Juneau property’s potential, try our StaySTRa Analyzer.

    Want these sorts of legal breakdowns in your inbox? Join the StaySTRa Insider mailing list!

    [^1]: See the original summary and in-depth reporting in Juneau Empire, June 2024.
    [^2]: For context, see the City and Borough of Juneau’s prior housing market analysis and STR impact reports.
    [^3]: Meeting minutes and task force reports, often available on the city website, provide granular insight for those who want to dig deeper.

    StaySTRa Insider
    Name