Key Takeaways
\n
- \n
- Austin generates approximately 25% higher average annual STR revenue than San Antonio, driven by premium ADR during event seasons.
- San Antonio offers significantly lower acquisition costs and a friendlier regulatory environment, making it ideal for first-time investors.
- Both cities collect Hotel Occupancy Tax, but San Antonio’s overall tax burden on STR operators is slightly lower.
- San Antonio’s tourism base is more stable and family-oriented, while Austin’s is younger, event-driven, and more seasonal.
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n
Market Snapshot: Austin vs San Antonio
\n\n
These two Central Texas metros sit just 80 miles apart on I-35, but their short-term rental markets operate very differently. Here is how they compare on the numbers that matter most. Note that these figures are estimates based on aggregated market data and may vary by neighborhood and property type.
\n\n
| Metric | Austin | San Antonio |
|---|---|---|
| Average ADR | $225 | $165 |
| Occupancy Rate | 58% | 61% |
| Average Annual Revenue | $47,600 | $36,700 |
| Active Listings | 8,200 | 6,400 |
| Regulation Strictness | Strict | Moderate |
| STR Tax Rate | 15% | 16.75% |
\n\n
Sponsored — Beeline
Finance Your Next STR With a DSCR Loan
Qualify on property cash flow, not W-2 income. Beeline specializes in fast DSCR closings for STR investors. No personal income verification required.
Check Your DSCR Eligibility →Affiliate disclosure: StaySTRA may earn a referral fee.
Revenue Potential
\n\n
Austin consistently outperforms San Antonio on a per-property revenue basis, primarily due to higher nightly rates. The gap narrows somewhat for smaller units, where San Antonio’s stronger occupancy partially offsets its lower ADR. For larger properties, Austin pulls ahead more decisively thanks to group travel demand for festivals and corporate retreats.
\n\n
| Property Type | Austin (Est. Annual Revenue) | San Antonio (Est. Annual Revenue) |
|---|---|---|
| 1-Bedroom | $28,000 | $21,500 |
| 2-Bedroom | $45,000 | $35,000 |
| 3-Bedroom | $68,000 | $52,000 |
\n\n
However, revenue tells only half the story. When you factor in acquisition costs, San Antonio’s return on investment often matches or exceeds Austin’s. A 3-bedroom property near the Pearl District or Southtown might cost $350,000 in San Antonio versus $550,000 or more for a comparable property in Austin’s popular neighborhoods. That difference in entry cost dramatically changes the cash-on-cash return calculation.
\n\n
Regulatory Environment
\n\n
Austin’s STR regulations are among the strictest in Texas. The city’s Type 1 and Type 2 permit system effectively limits non-owner-occupied rentals in residential zones. New Type 2 permits are no longer being issued, which creates a barrier for investors who want to buy and rent without living on-site. Operators must register annually, display permit numbers in listings, and comply with detailed noise, parking, and occupancy rules.
\n\n
San Antonio takes a more welcoming stance toward STR operators. The city requires registration and HOT collection but does not impose the same permit caps or owner-occupancy requirements. San Antonio does have density limits in some historic districts and requires compliance with noise and trash ordinances. Overall, the regulatory friction is meaningfully lower, which lets investors move faster from acquisition to first booking.
\n\n
Market Trends
\n\n
Austin’s STR market is maturing after years of rapid growth. Supply additions have slowed, and competition among hosts has intensified. Average revenue per listing has declined modestly from its 2022 peak as more hosts compete for a similar pool of guests. The market is shifting toward professional operators who can optimize pricing and guest experience, while casual hosts with uncompetitive listings are seeing reduced bookings.
\n\n
San Antonio’s market is earlier in its growth cycle. The city’s tourism infrastructure continues to expand, with new attractions, convention center upgrades, and hotel development signaling confidence in the market’s trajectory. STR supply is growing but at a pace the market appears to absorb comfortably. The River Walk, Alamo, and military base visitor traffic provide a demand floor that insulates the market from sharp downturns.
\n\n
Best For
\n\n
Austin is best for: Investors with higher capital reserves who want to maximize per-property revenue. Operators skilled at dynamic pricing who can exploit event-driven demand spikes. Those who already hold or can acquire a Type 2 STR permit.
\n\n
San Antonio is best for: Budget-conscious investors seeking strong cash-on-cash returns with lower acquisition costs. First-time STR operators who want a simpler regulatory path. Investors targeting family and military travel demographics with consistent year-round demand.
\n\n
The Bottom Line
\n\n
Austin and San Antonio represent two distinct investment strategies within the same state. Austin is the higher-ceiling, higher-complexity play. If you can secure the right property with the right permit and manage it effectively, the revenue potential is real. But the barriers are higher, the competition is fiercer, and the margin for operational error is thinner.
\n\n
San Antonio is the fundamentals play. Lower entry costs, straightforward regulations, and stable tourism demand make it a market where solid returns are achievable without heroic effort. The revenue per property is lower in absolute terms, but the math often works out better when you account for what you paid to get in.
\n\n
For most investors building their first or second STR property in 2026, San Antonio offers the more forgiving path. For those with experience and capital, Austin remains one of the top STR markets in the country when operated correctly.
\n\n
Frequently Asked Questions
\n\n
Is San Antonio too far from Austin to manage both markets?
\n
Not necessarily. The two cities are about 80 miles apart on I-35, roughly a 90-minute drive. Many investors operate properties in both markets using local co-hosts or property managers. Remote management tools make it feasible to run a portfolio across both metros.
\n
\n\n
Which city has better year-round occupancy?
\n
San Antonio edges out Austin on year-round consistency. Austin’s occupancy spikes during major events but dips in slower months like January and August. San Antonio’s tourism demand is more evenly distributed, supported by the River Walk, conventions, and military-related travel throughout the year.
\n
\n\n
Do I need a permit to operate an STR in San Antonio?
\n
San Antonio requires STR registration and Hotel Occupancy Tax collection. The registration process is straightforward compared to Austin’s permit system. There is no cap on the number of registrations, and the city does not distinguish between owner-occupied and investor-owned properties in most zones.
\n
\n\n
How do property taxes compare between the two cities?
\n
Both cities have relatively high property tax rates, which is common across Texas since the state has no income tax. San Antonio’s effective property tax rate is slightly lower than Austin’s in most jurisdictions, but both markets require investors to budget 2% to 2.5% of assessed value annually for property taxes.
\n
\n\n
Which market is growing faster for STR supply?
\n
San Antonio is currently growing faster in terms of new listing additions as a percentage of existing supply. Austin’s growth has plateaued due to regulatory constraints and market maturity. San Antonio still has room to absorb new inventory, particularly in emerging neighborhoods south and east of downtown.
\n
\n
